Starting with the horizon very low in shot 1, the result is
that of a shallow and very wide looking field with the sky above appearing less
wide, yet showing much more depth. In shot 2 with the horizon slightly higher,
the extra depth to the field makes it look less wide than in the previous shot,
whereas the sky now looks wider.
I find the third shot the most interesting. As a result of
the horizon being along the centre of the shot, both the width and depth of the
land and sky are equal. The effect of this balance is that the eye is drawn to
the horizon and in this particular set; I feel that more depth is created in
the picture as a whole.
As we move through the subsequent shots, the higher the
horizon gets, the deeper and narrower the field looks and the wider and
shallower the sky looks.
Although the height of the horizon has a significant effect
on the depth of different elements of the shot, there is another contributing
factor: in the latter shots, more foreground interest is shown, drawing the eye
to the front of the scene. I have noticed that the cottage in shot 6 looks
bigger and closer than in shot 1. Logically, I would have thought that with the
extra appearance of depth to the field, the cottage would have looked further
away. Checking through the mid-range shots, I have found that as the field gets
deeper, the cottage does seem further away and it is only the introduction of
foreground interest that brings the cottage closer.
Having discovered these effects, I feel a need to explore my
findings further by repeating the exercise with different landscapes. I would
also like to explore the effect of the horizon in the same place but with and
without foreground interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment