As the first image shows, without a diffuser a dark shadow is created
with sharp edges, reflecting the shape of the object; this is quite distracting
and takes focus away from the image. The elephant itself shows a good tonal
range with bright highlights to the top.
The second image is taken using a diffuser between the light and the
subject. The shadow has almost gone from below the elephant which makes the
image appear less cluttered. The lighting is also much more even and the stark
highlight at the top of the elephant’s back is almost gone.
In many situations, the diffused image would be by far the best. In portrait
shots, it is preferable to omit shadows as they can be distracting and make the
image look less appealing. The reduced contrast can also be a bonus in many
images.
Taking this subject as a specific example, the image I prefer would depend on the context and the reason I was taking the shot. If I were selling the elephant, in order to advertise I would want a clutter free image which shows the subject with no distractions. The reduced contrast enables the client to see the actual colours on the elephant much more clearly.
If I just wanted to create an interesting image using this elephant, I
would be more inclined to go for the undiffused version. The contrast creates
interest and promotes the lines and curves of the body and as a result of the slats;
the shadow creates added interest reflection the shapes above.
I know that there is a lot to learn about the technicalities of
lighting, however just from attempting this exercise, I have learned that a lot
of thought should go into what you are trying to achieve before working out
what lighting arrangements could create the effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment